|
Go
![]() |
New
![]() |
Find
![]() |
Notify
![]() |
Tools
![]() |
Reply
![]() |
|
Junior High![]() Registered: March 24, 2005
Posts: 465
|
If I'm not mistaken, I believe these are the district assignments for Class A, assuming the NSAA is using the same technique for determining the districts (remove Marian, add Scotus' enrollment to Columbus). Is that correct?
A-1 Omaha Central Omaha Burke Omaha North Lincoln North Star Omaha Northwest Lincoln East Columbus Elkhorn A-2 Millard North Grand Island Lincoln Southwest Lincoln Southeast Bellevue East Papillion La Vista Fremont South Sioux City A-3 Omaha Creighton Prep Millard South Omaha South Lincoln High Papillion La Vista South Lincoln Northeast Norfolk Ralston A-4 Millard West Omaha Westside Omaha Bryan Bellevue West Omaha Benson Kearney North Platte Lincoln Pius X This message has been edited. Last edited by: SlvrHwk, |
|
Junior Varsity Registered: October 16, 2005
Posts: 797
|
A-3 looking tough with MS and Prep.
|
|
Rookie Registered: October 20, 2002
Posts: 81
|
where are you finding this information? A-1 looks pretty tough. North is always talented with Lincoln East, Kearney, and Elkhorn being traditional powers.
|
Junior High![]() Registered: March 24, 2005
Posts: 465
|
NSAA website has enrollment figures posted.
|
|
Rookie Registered: October 23, 2002
Posts: 73
|
I think you have Columbus and Kearney reversed. Kearney has 1056 and the Columbus + Scotus coop has a total of 1053.
|
Rookie![]() Registered: January 27, 2008
Posts: 27
|
A-3 is looking pretty tough in the upper weight classes
|
|
Rookie Registered: October 30, 2005
Posts: 198
|
So...what is the right answer on the Kearney and Columbus deal? Are they switched around?
|
Junior High![]() Registered: March 24, 2005
Posts: 465
|
Yep, they're now fixed.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() Moderator Location: Good Ole USA
Registered: October 24, 2002
Posts: 5090
|
With the classifications out today and if they follow the "serpentine" method, I think the above is correct except South Sioux and Elkhorn will be reversed.
The "official" assignments should be out soon. 1. 1989 A Omaha Central 1 5. 1568 A Omaha Burke 1 9. 1482 A Omaha North 1 13. 1283 A Lincoln North Star 1 17. 1205 A Omaha Northwest 1 21. 1112 A Lincoln East 1 25. 1053 A Columbus (Columbus Scotus) 1 29. 935 A South Sioux City (Homer) 1 2. 1857 A Millard North 2 6. 1559 A Grand Island 2 10. 1391 A Lincoln Southwest 2 14. 1250 A Lincoln Southeast 2 18. 1182 A Bellevue East 2 22. 1082 A Papillion-La Vista 2 26. 1026 A Fremont 2 30. 906 A Elkhorn 2 3. 1636 A Omaha Creighton Prep 3 7. 1555 A Millard South 3 11. 1386 A Omaha South 3 15. 1234 A Lincoln High 3 19. 1167 A Papillion-La Vista South 3 23. 1074 A Lincoln Northeast 3 27. 955 A Norfolk 3 31. 804 A Ralston 3 4. 1595 A Millard West 4 8. 1491 A Omaha Westside 4 12. 1352 A Omaha Bryan 4 16. 1215 A Bellevue West 4 20. 1126 A Omaha Benson 4 24. 1056 A Kearney 4 28. 940 A North Platte 4 32. 777 A Lincoln Pius X 4 ----------------- "A PEOPLE THAT VALUES ITS PRIVILEGES OVER ITS PRINCIPLES, SOON LOSES BOTH" EISENHOWER |
Junior High![]() Registered: March 24, 2005
Posts: 465
|
My bad--I wasn't aware that SSC added Homer. Thanks, RR!
|
Rookie![]() Registered: January 27, 2008
Posts: 27
|
5 of the 8 in A-3 in the heavyweight weight class are top rated...........makes for a tough fight for the Qwest
|
|
Rookie Registered: September 06, 2007
Posts: 8
![]() |
who are the 5 who are top rated?
|
|
Rookie Registered: October 22, 2008
Posts: 29
|
All this talk about A-3, A-1 imo looks like the toughest by far!
"To be the best you have to beat the best" |
|
Rookie Registered: January 06, 2008
Posts: 44
|
As usual, it looks like deserving kids will be staying home from the Qwest this year. Apparently it's impossible to balance those districts and weight classes so everyone gets an even chance. Too bad that that "luck of the draw," has to play into the results.
|
|
Rookie Registered: September 06, 2007
Posts: 8
![]() |
so does anyone know who the 5 top rated heavyweights are in district A-3 are?
|
![]() ![]() ![]() Moderator Location: Good Ole USA
Registered: October 24, 2002
Posts: 5090
|
There haven't been any "ratings" released to my knowledge. If you are a Huskermat.com Insider, a list of "Top Wrestlers By Weight" can be seen by clicking here. I assume that is what ShampooIsBetter was referencing. But again, that information is reserved for Huskermat.com Insiders! ----------------- "A PEOPLE THAT VALUES ITS PRIVILEGES OVER ITS PRINCIPLES, SOON LOSES BOTH" EISENHOWER |
| Previous Topic | Next Topic | powered by eve community |
| Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|

