Junior Varsity Location: pierce, ne Registered: February 11, 2004 Posts: 736 |
Here's my problem with this idea of yours. Letting it go and moving on is not a good solution. Nothing gets better if everyone forgets about it. If nebraska wrestling wants to move forward and get better recognition for our kids, then your idea of moving on is going to hold us back. These simple ideas that everyone has are the basis of some great plan of the future. I know that sounds a little far fetched, but how do you think things get better, definitly not by moving on and just letting it go!!! Guaranteed LOUDEST guy in the gym!!!! |
State Qualifier Registered: March 21, 2005 Posts: 1035 |
|
Rookie Registered: August 23, 2005 Posts: 23 | It's good to have ideas to make next year's Brawl even better. Keep them coming! Just tired of the complaints on which wrestlers were chosen and how they didn't meet the expectations of the so called "experts". |
Junior Varsity Location: pierce, ne Registered: February 11, 2004 Posts: 736 | I agree with you that the negativity towards the young men is not a postitive step in moving forward, it never is. Constructive criticism is ok, but alot of the criticism on here is not constructive at all. I really think the brawl is a giant step should the state of nebraska choose to embrace it the right way. The problem among us is finding the correct way to embrace it. Guaranteed LOUDEST guy in the gym!!!! |
Rookie Registered: February 16, 2006 Posts: 54 | Frank, I’m going to agree with you and disagree with you at the same time. I do agree that the larger pool of wrestlers in IA, vying for the same number of spots, does lead to better overall competition at the state tournament….BUT, you can not disregard the more difficult qualification process in IA Class A and 2A being a factor. In NE, you have to win 2, 3, or maybe 4 matches to get to the state tournament. Those matches come in a tournament where the best and worst wrestlers at that weight class are present. Place in the top 4 and it’s off to state you go. In IA, you have to win 2, 3, or 4 matches (true wrestleback for 2nd place) to place in the top 2 and qualify for the district tournament. At the district tournament, you have to win an additional two matches, against wrestlers who are also sectional champions or runner-ups, to place in the top 2 and qualify for the state tournament (also a true wrestleback for 2nd place). Then, you are placed in a bracket with 15 other wrestlers, who just went through the same kick in the nuts qualifying process! This process forces wrestlers to be at their peak physical and mental shape as well as peaking technically for more matches over a longer period of time. This process ensures that there is better competition at the state tourney. |
State Qualifier Registered: March 21, 2005 Posts: 1035 | Hammerlock, You are right. I was thinking that is you have 16 kids in a weight class it doesn't matter whether its a 16 man district or 4 sectionals of 4 wrestlers each feeding the top two into an 8 wrestler district. But when I did the math I realized that winner would wrestle 2 matches in the sectional and then 3 in district to qualify so it would take 5 wins. The winner of a 16 wrestler district would need 4 wins to be district champ. The second placer of a 16 wrestler district could qualify for state with 3 wins and then losing in the finals. When you bring in the potential for the true second wrestleback in both sectional and district he could need a lot more wins to qualify for state than through a 16 wrestler district. (It's too late at night for me to do that math, but trust me it would take more wins.) We had a weird situation when I was coaching in Iowa. A wrestler placed 2 or 3 in state when he was a junior. Then his family moved to a small town that didn't have wrestling. There was no co-op in those days. A school 20-25 miles away invited the kid to work out with them but IHSAA rules kept the kid from wrestling in competition. The coach asked the AD in the kid's high school to enter their school in the sectional-district-state series. We just had 2 classes then so there were a lot of kids in his sectional. The kid hadn't had competition for a year so he wasn't in great shape and he was rusty. He got 3rd in the sectional but 3rd is on standby in case 1 or 2 gets hurt, doesn't make weight, etc. It happened so the kid got to go to district as a standby. He qualified for state by finishing 2nd in district, then won state.This message has been edited. Last edited by: Frank Ryan, |
Rookie Registered: September 01, 2005 Posts: 55 | There are some great idea's on here. Nebraska is a very good wrestling state. If the main goal is catch the those 4 or 5 elite states. You have to look into having 3 classes Like Iowa does. We have to many kids that do not wrestle out of season and are good enough athletes to win. If you go three classes you will have 4 or 5 kids in each weight that wrestle 40+ matches out of season, so even if you are a good athlete or not you will have to spend a lot of time on the mat if you want to place. I was just looking at WIN magazine rankings on the net, Iowa had 10 rated kids and Nebraska had 6. Iowa had 8 that were in the top ten, out of Nebraska's 6 / 2 were in the top ten. Maybee Nebraska could be a front runner if we changed a few things. We are getting a lot of National attention because Nebraska colleges are doing so well. I think there is a high level intrest in getting better, what would it hurt. |
Varsity Letterman Registered: November 17, 2003 Posts: 850 | I went back and read all the posts and wonder why would anyone want to wrestle in this two weeks before Senior Nationals Seems a little negative to meThis message has been edited. Last edited by: GO4ZPIN, The state of Nebraska is won on your feet . James Berger |
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |