World Champion Registered: August 27, 2002 Posts: 6425 | Heard the proposal to increase Class A to 40 teams went through the assembly last night and will now be voted on this spring. I said it earlier this year that this was just a matter of time. This IMO is long overdue! |
Junior High Location: Hastings, NE, USA Registered: December 09, 2002 Posts: 487 | I have a quick question. How many teams will be in Class B then? Do they more some teams up from C to B? I remember reading about it but I forgot the details. Coach Brand |
Novice Location: Gering Registered: February 27, 2005 Posts: 297 | Currently, 1. Omaha Central 1996 2. Millard North 1777 3. Omaha Northwest 1594 4. Omaha North 1592 5. Omaha Creighton Prep 1580 6. Millard South 1576 7. Omaha Burke 1563 8. Omaha South 1515 9. Grand Island 1496 10. Omaha Westside 1480 11. Millard West 1463 12. Lincoln Southwest 1399 13. Omaha Benson 1301 14. Omaha Bryan 1251 15. Lincoln North Star 1214 16. Lincoln High 1195 17. Lincoln East 1172 18. Lincoln Northeast 1138 19. Bellevue West 1122 20. Lincoln Southeast 1107 21. Papillion-LaVista 1096 22. Norfolk 1080 23. Bellevue East 1074 24. Kearney 1062 25. Columbus (Columbus Scotus) 1054 26. Fremont 1026 27. Papillion-LaVista South 999 28. North Platte 925 29. Elkhorn 824 30. Ralston 766 31. South Sioux City 747 32. Lincoln Pius X 724 This proposal would then add the following to A 33. Hastings 724 34. Scottsbluff 703 35. Lexington 606 36. Beatrice 587 37. Blair 514 38. Omaha Skutt Catholic 512 39. Grand Island Northwest 510 40. Alliance 467 Gering also has 467, Gretna has 457. So, depending on next years enrollment one of those could "flip-flop" with Alliance for the last A spot. I assume they would then move 8 from C to B which would be these programs 1. West Point-Beemer 196 2. Milford 195 3. Conestoga 194 4. Raymond Central 193 5. Minden 192 6. Syracuse 190 7. Central City 186 8. Centennial 181 Depending on next years enrollment, one of these programs could "flip-flop" with Centennial, 9. Norfolk Catholic 176, 10. HTRS/Pawnee City 169, 11. Red Cloud/Blue Hill 168 Once again assuming they would move 8 up from D into C, it would be these programs: 1. Aquinas 109 2. Stanton 106 3. Palmyra 106 4. Southwest 106 5. East Butler 105 6. Medicine Valley/Maywood 104 7. Heartland 103 8. Thayer Central 102 These programs could "flip-flop" with several of the above mentioned schools. 9. Elkhorn Valley 101, 10. Hemingford 101, 11. Sutton 101, 12. North Platte St. Patrick's 100, 13. Sutherland 100, 14. Ponca 99, 15. Howells 96, 16. Clearwater-Elgin 96 |
World Champion Registered: August 27, 2002 Posts: 6425 | This would be the first step towards going to a three class system. |
Rookie Registered: October 23, 2002 Posts: 75 | Take a look at the Class D districts now. Look at all of the open weights. Now then take the 8 largest schools out of Class D and how many opens will you have at the Class D districts then? I say if you are going to change it, then just go to one class because you are already moving will beyond enrollment parity which is why there is more than one class in the first place. So if enrollment parity doesn't matter then there should just be one class. Also if it is good for wrestling then it has to be good for football and basketball and track and all of the other sports, because remember enrollment parity doesn't matter. the NSAA won't like going to one class or even 3 classes for that matter because they won't make as much money on their state tournament with fewer people attending. I think you will also start to see more schools dropping wrestling or else merging with other schools because they can't be competitive. |
World Champion Registered: August 27, 2002 Posts: 6425 | Why do you have to mess with D? |
World Champion Registered: August 27, 2002 Posts: 6425 | Trying to compare wrestling to football, basketball etc is ridiculous. Its apples and oranges-completely different sports. As much as we like to talk about "teams" in wrestling this is an individual sport where the size of the school is essentially irrelevant. And since we know the NSAA won't ever go to a one-class system, lets just leave that notion out of it. |
NCAA All American Location: Helena, MT, USA Registered: October 21, 2002 Posts: 1760 | It will go 40 Class A schools, 48 Class B schools, and then divide the rest evenly into C and D. If it is an odd #, there would be 1 more class D school. So it looks like the 8 biggest schools are being taken out of C but because of the half and half part, really only losing 4 schools. Is my logic correct? Lets say there are 170 schools to divide for c and d... that would be 85 schools in c and 85 in d (roughly 21 schools per district). If I subtract 8 schools, we're down to 162 schools, which means 81 schools in class c, which is roughly 20 schools per district. You don't water c and d down as much as you might think......... Rick Henry |
Rookie Registered: December 05, 2005 Posts: 50 | From NSAA February Bulletin issue: FF. Proposal Activities manual Pg's 12,13. Schools registered for wrestling are divided into four classes. 1. Based on combined enrollment grades 9-11 2. 40 largest schools = Class A 3. Next 48 schools = Class B 4. Remaining schools will be divided evenly into Classes C & D. *All four Class A Districts will now have 10 teams in each District. Vote: For= 71 Against= 51 Abstain= 54 Also a vote that passed was this. "For seeding wrestlers at the district wrestling tournament, only those matches wrestled, as part of a team's 30-point varsity schedule will be considered." Am I missing something or isn't this already in place? |
State Qualifier Registered: October 16, 2005 Posts: 1077 | Gering and Alliance were both A before, yes? |
Novice Location: Gering Registered: February 27, 2005 Posts: 297 | Ok, so the aforementioned scenario is accurate for A & B only. Gering and Alliance have both been A at various points throughout history. |
World Champion Location: Wayne, America Registered: October 20, 2002 Posts: 5714 | Assuming no schools are added or deleted, the new classification structure would be as follows: A -- 40 B -- 48 C -- 64-65 D -- 67-66 I do know that Yutan will probably add wrestling next year, and there could be other changes with possible consolidations either adding or taking away from the number. "Energy Flows Where Attention Goes" -- James Arthur Ray |
Novice Location: Gering Registered: February 27, 2005 Posts: 297 | The new C & D... C 1. Norfolk Catholic 176 2. HTRS/Pawnee City 169 3. Red Cloud/Blue Hill 168 4. St. Paul 166 5. Grand Island Central Catholic/Heartland Lutheran 166 6. Mitchell 161 7. Madison 160 8. Bishop Neumann 158 9. Chase County 156 10. Laurel-Concord/Coleridge 155 11. Hastings St. Cecilia 154 12. Fort Calhoun 154 13. Ord 152 14. Sargent/Burwell 152 15. Battle Creek 151 16. Lincoln Christian 147 17. North Bend Central 147 18. Tekamah-Herman 146 19. David City 145 20. Bruning-Davenport/Deshler 145 21. Kimball 144 22. Crofton 144 23. Gibbon 142 24. Ainsworth 140 25. Arlington 140 26. Perkins County 138 27. Wood River 138 28. Hershey 138 29. Centura 137 30. Bennington 135 31. Wisner-Pilger 135 32. Louisville 134 33. Wilber-Clatonia 133 34. Southern Valley 133 35. Fillmore Central 132 36. Creighton 131 37. Kearney Catholic 125 38. West Holt 124 39. Tri County 124 40. Bayard 121 41. Doniphan-Trumbull 121 42. Hartington Cedar Catholic 120 43. Wakefield 120 44. Southern 118 45. Lutheran High Northeast 118 46. Oakland-Craig 117 47. Bridgeport 116 48. West Point Central Catholic 116 49. Neligh-Oakdale 116 50. Ravenna 115 51. Plainview 114 52. Malcolm 114 53. Randolph 113 54. Morrill 113 55. Harvard/Clay Center 111 56. Tecumseh 110 57. Aquinas 109 58.Stanton 106 59.Palmyra 106 60.Southwest 106 61.East Butler 105 62.Medicine Valley/Maywood 104 63.Heartland 103 64.Thayer Central 102 65.Elkhorn Valley 101 D 1. Hemingford 101 2. Sutton 101 3. North Platte St. Patrick's 100 4. Sutherland 100 5. Ponca 99 6. Howells 96 7. Clearwater-Elgin 96 8. High Plains Community 94 9. Pender 92 10. Franklin 92 11. Elm Creek 92 12. Fullerton 91 13. Osmond 91 14. Ansley/Arcadia 91 15. Garden County 89 16. Loup City 89 17. Shelton 89 18. Friend 88 19. Wilcox-Hildreth 87 20. Weeping Water 85 21. Archbishop Bergan 84 22. Nebraska Christian 84 23. Cross County 83 24. Newman Grove 82 25. Alma 82 26. Overton 81 27. Crawford 81 28. Axtell 79 29. Arapahoe 77 30. Pope John 77 31. Humphrey St. Francis 76 32. Maxwell 76 33. Osceola 74 34. Elwood 73 35. Scribner-Snyder 73 36. Amherst 73 37. Hitchcock County 70 38. Dundy County 70 39. Palmer 70 40. Callaway 70 41. Sandhills (Thedford) 70 42. Freeman 69 43. Anselmo-Merna 68 44. Eustis-Farnam 68 45. Winside 67 46. Wauneta-Palisade 65 47. Cambridge 64 48. Pleasanton 60 49. Dorchester 60 50. McCool Junction 60 51. Rock County 59 52. Minatare 59 53. Meridian 57 54. Loomis 57 55. Cedar Rapids 56 56. Kenesaw 56 57. Banner County 54 58. Greeley-Wolbach 51 59. Arnold 51 60. Sumner-Eddyville-Miller 51 61. Lindsay Holy Family 48 62. Bertrand 45 63. Mullen 45 64. Hay Springs 40 65. Hyannis 36 66. Sioux County 26 Total enrollment in class D would be 4789, more than 500 fewer than just the top 3 in class A. |
Rookie Registered: December 21, 2005 Posts: 153 | This is not a done deal. Many of the schools pass in issues on the 1st vote however want to wait until the spring meeting to hear the issues from both sides. Also we are not going to three classes. There is nothing on the agenda and no other sports want to cut back. Each school is given an equal vote and there are very few class D schools or for that matter very few class C schools that want to change. Don't look for this to happen. |
Moderator Location: Omaha,NE,USA Registered: October 19, 2002 Posts: 1116 |
Alliance was Class A with in the last 10 yrs and i think Gering was around that time also. "It's in the bag coach, it's in the bag." |
Rookie Registered: December 05, 2005 Posts: 50 | Why wouldn't Class C and Class D want to change? I think this is a good idea for all wrestling classes. Alliance, Scottsbluff, Gering used to be Class A, but remember about all of the new Class A schools in the Omaha and Lincoln area in the last few years. |
World Champion Location: Wayne, America Registered: October 20, 2002 Posts: 5714 | You won't see wrestling cut back to 3 classes anytime soon, if ever. If anything, NSAA will ADD a 5th/6th class (C-1/C-2 and D-1/D-2) as they did with basketball, football and volleyball before they cut classes. They want as many state qualifiers as possible for a number of reasons (mo money, mo kids who can call themselves state qualifiers/medalists/champions, etc.). As for the current proposal, I think the only objections will come from the Class A schools that don't seem to think there is a problem with the current setup (and, just for the record, there is IMO). Those opinions will be outweighed by the Class B schools that would like to get Omaha Skutt out of the class, and I think there are enough D schools that would like to reduce the size of their districts (19 per district) to go back to 16-man brackets (although none of the districts likely will field a full 16-man bracket). The only schools I see objecting to the change are those who are on the bubble between classes (B up to A, C up to B, D up to C). If wrestling continues to grow, the next move will probably be to make A and B 48 schools each, and after that a move to five classes, all with 48 schools. There are 219 schools in wrestling this year -- Yutan would make 220 next year -- leaving you 20 schools short of the 240 needed for five 48-school classes. As Dennis Miller would say -- Of course, that's just my opinion...I could be wrong. "Energy Flows Where Attention Goes" -- James Arthur Ray |
World Champion Registered: August 27, 2002 Posts: 6425 |
I'll bet you a hundie and raise you 5 that it does happen. And I will definitely be campaigning for it. |
Rookie Location: Omaha, NE Registered: December 12, 2002 Posts: 161 | Well, well, well, HB....you should always do your homework, my man. If you look at the way the proposal was written, it is fraught with a ton of faulty logic that can be refuted with a little data. Whatever happened to legislation being driven by data? Whatever happened to that. Basically the proposal by Auburn was by a coach and an admin that has a great 8th and 7th grade class. They would like to have a chance to win the whole thing before those kids graduate.....as is, they likely won't. Before this thing is voted on, I plan to throw my actuary hat on to see what the data shows. One thing it shows right off hand, however, is that class A state qualifiers average around 68% win record. The other classes combined have about 73%, and the other classes probably don't have as many "repeat matches" as exist in class A. Any way you look at it, this deviation is pretty close, not one that would show the disparity that has been indicated previously. In fact, football in class A (state playoff teams) win % was well below the other classes. Nobody is clamoring for a change there????? And you say it is simply because of individual vs team sports????? Wow, I don't see it that way. Maybe the w/l thing can be attributed to parity in any case...ever think about that? What gets me is that this thing was voted on right....well with a little research, I have found that most coaches weren't even aware of the vote, and most coaches didn't have a chance to lodge their opinion on the vote...why would that be? The foundation of sports in Nebraska was founded around an enrollment system. This much is true. What people didn't want was a school with 2500 competing against a school with 200 kids (you get the drift). The theory is that a school with 2500 has more kids that can participate and a better chance to have better teams......Follow. OK so when there became too many teams in the present four class system...what was done? I tell you...we added C-2 and D-2....and again, nobody complained about the watered down system. People liked the increased opportunity for kids. Well over the years....wrestling has grown time and time again. Nobody said one word about adding a class....it became....let's reorganize. I could go on and on, HB, but I will tell you that the Data is going to be served and the vote will be one based on logic and not on people wanting "more and better action"..... When we get the numbers all together, then let's look them over to see what they tell us. Let's see how many kids are out in each of the teams that offer wrestling. Let's look at how many teams fill rosters and let's look at a ton of data that will tell us what to do. Then let's make a decision. I think we can all live with that. And then let's see about making sure that we don't just pull wrestling out of the state matrix. Certainly, track and other sports, can be held accountable for the same model as is proposed here. Well, I guess it is time to do the numbers baby........ |
World Champion Registered: August 27, 2002 Posts: 6425 | If you listen to the archive from this past year's Boys Town tournament, I talked specifically about this issue and I said within 5 years Class A would be 40 teams. As much as no one wants to say this is primarily a Skutt issue, it really is. There's no question that most want them out of B. It reminds of what happened with the Nebraska football program in the early 1990s. When TO got the program so powerful that no one could compete with them, the NCAA and conference changed the rules to stymie their success. When Skutt scores 250 points this year and has about 8 state champions, what is the NSAA going to do? I believe that the domination will cause enough people to make the 40 team thing happen. Going to 40 teams gives us the best of both worlds-a fuller and better Class A and Skutt competing against teams that can draw from the same talent pools as they do. IMO its a win-win situation for fans, small schools and wrestling in the state. And once again, wrestling is a unique sport. What's wrong with legislating change in one sport? I don't see a problem with it. |